American Experiment senior policy fellow, Katherine Kersten, joined ‘Fox & Friends Weekend’ to discuss the impact of ‘wokeness’ in America’s classrooms.
Top Comment:
“It is heartbreaking watching the great USA being ripped apart by identity politics.”
Hollywood actor Jim Caviezel has taken a bold step by voicing his support for President Donald Trump, potentially risking his career.
Caviezel, renowned for his role in the acclaimed movie “Sound of Freedom,” drew a parallel between President Trump and the biblical figure King David.
The veteran actor, known for his role in Mel Gibson’s epic film “Passion of the Christ,” expressed his belief that “Trump was chosen by God Almighty” to assume leadership.
“When you go back to David, Trump is like that,” Caviezel said during an appearance on Steve Bannon‘s War Room podcast.
“Here’s a boy that was called out and many people didn’t like him as including his own—I’m talking about David now—own father.
“And he was selected by God.
“I believe Donald Trump was selected by God almighty.
“He probably didn’t think he was the best guy to be president.
“Or maybe he thought he was the best guy because in my opinion, he’s pretty great.
“A guy like him will be able to sit there and watch this ‘Sound of Freedom’ and feel safe and peace, and I think that a lot of people that watch this that are following God, feel that way.”
Both Trump and Caviezel share a deep commitment to combating human trafficking.
The former 45th President of the United States has openly endorsed Caviezel’s recent film addressing child trafficking, “Sound of Freedom.”
Trump has even organized screenings of the movie to raise awareness about the issue.
“Thank you all so much, that was incredible,” Trump said to the crowd at a screening he held for the movie at his golf club in New Jersey.
“Jim, that was unbelievable.
“It’s something that I’m not sure if you’re supposed to enjoy or learn.
“It’s a combination, but that was a great movie.
“Now I understand why it’s doing so well.
“It’s setting records by the way, it’s eating the biggest movies out there, they have some of the big summer blockbusters and this is knocking the socks off of them.
“So that’s pretty good,” he said.
“I hope everybody had a fantastic time, I did, It’s an incredible inspiration.
“You guys do something very special.”
FOX News’ Bill Melugin provides details on the mass release of migrants as Border Patrol struggles to keep up with the immigration crisis.
Top Comment:
“This is absolutely unbelievable”
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), a member of the Republican Party, asserted that there exists both indirect and direct evidence of “corruption” associated with President Joe Biden, who belongs to the Democratic Party.
The senator was reacting to inaccurate assertions from Democrats and certain segments of the corporate media, who have argued that there is “no evidence” warranting an impeachment inquiry into President Biden.
Cruz contradicted these claims by presenting the evidence against Biden while appearing on Fox News’s “Hannity.”
“The House of Representatives announced they are formally opening an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden,” Cruz told Sean Hannity.
“I think that’s exactly the right thing for them to do.
“I’ve been calling on the House to do this for many months now.
“And, you know, one of the interesting ways to assess what’s going on is to look at the Biden White House’s shifting stories, and you played quite a bit of this in your monologue, started off with Joe Biden saying, I’ve never talked with my son about any of his overseas business dealings.
“Turns out that was a lie,” Cruz noted.
“Their next story was: I’ve never done business with my son in his overseas business dealings.
“Turns out that was a lie,” he asserted.
“You know, the latest talking points Democrats are trying to trot out in response to this impeachment inquiry is there is no direct evidence of Joe’s involvement in the corruption.
“So they’ve pretty much given up on Hunter.
“Yeah, Hunter’s corrupt is the day is long, but there’s no direct evidence of Joe’s involvement.
“That’s what they’re saying.
“Now, that’s a flat-out lie, too, but let me break it down in two pieces.
“Number one, and in a trial, in a legal proceeding, there are two types of evidence.
“There’s direct evidence and circumstantial evidence.
“Now, what is circumstantial evidence?” asked Cruz, a constitutional scholar.
“I’ll give you an example:
“If you go to sleep tonight and you look outside the window, and you go to sleep, and the street is clean, and you wake up in the morning, and you look out the window, and there is snow covering the ground, that is circumstantial evidence that during the night, it snowed.
“But you know what? It’s pretty damn good evidence, circumstantial evidence.
“People are convicted and sent to jail every day of the week based on circumstantial evidence.
“Circumstantial evidence is you draw inferences from the circumstances.
“That’s compared to direct evidence.
“Direct evidence is testimony from someone who said I saw it snowing last night.
“That’s direct evidence,” the senator noted.
“There’s at least two instances of direct evidence of Joe’s corruption.
“Number one, you played on this show, which is Joe Biden’s admission in front of the Council on Foreign Relations that he held a billion dollars of U.S. taxpayer loan guarantees hostage in order to force the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating the Ukrainian oligarch.
“That is one of the critical elements of bribery, of the quid pro quo.
“Quid pro quo, as you know, is Latin for this for that.
“The ‘that’ Joe Biden has admitted to that is direct evidence that he’s admitted to.
“The only question is, is there the ‘quid?’ Is there the $5 to 10 million of payments?
“Now, on that, there is circumstantial evidence.
“There are the million dollars plus of payments to the Biden family, and there is also the consistent pattern of obstruction and covering it up, which in any court of law you would draw a negative inference from.”
WATCH:
The Biden White House has continually shifted the goal post on President Biden’s alleged corruption.
At first, he never talked with Hunter about his overseas business dealings.
Then, he “never did business” with Hunter’s overseas partners.
Now, there is no direct evidence.… pic.twitter.com/uiZhVMIa80
— Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) September 13, 2023
slaynews.com/news/ted-cruz-overrules-joe-biden-theres-at-least-two-instances-of-direct-evidence-of-joes-corruption/
The ‘Fox & Friends’ co-hosts discussed the latest on the Biden impeachment inquiry and Pelosi’s dodging questions on whether VP Harris is the best running mate for Biden.
Top Comment:
“No one with a conscience and a sense of justice should ever vote for the Democratic Party!”
Democratic Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) delivered an unconventional response when approached by a reporter seeking his opinion on the impeachment inquiry launched against President Joe Biden.
On Tuesday, Speaker Kevin McCarthy declared his directive for House committee leaders to initiate an impeachment inquiry into President Biden.
Shortly after this announcement, a reporter encountered Fetterman in the basement of the U.S. Capitol and sought his reaction.
When NBC’s Liz Brown-Kaiser inquired about the news, Fetterman paused and attentively listened to her question. However, before she could complete her inquiry, Fetterman unexpectedly became animated and began gesturing with his hands.
“Oh my God, really??!” Fetterman said, clutching his head mockingly.
“Oh my gosh,” he added, waving his hands around.
“You know, oh, it’s devastating,” Fetterman continued while bursting out laughing.
“Ooooooooo! Don’t do it!” Fetterman said to the reporter while making a motion with his hands.
“Please, don’t do it! Oh, no! Oh, no!”
WATCH:
.@SenFettermanPA reacts to Speaker McCarthy moving forward with a House impeachment inquiry into POTUS…
(Just watch) pic.twitter.com/jg3aeyDW7F
— Liz Brown-Kaiser (@lizbrownkaiser) September 12, 2023
In a concise statement delivered at the U.S. Capitol, McCarthy declared that the House is advancing an impeachment inquiry.
McCarthy disclosed that House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) will oversee the impeachment inquiry.
Comer will collaborate closely with Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) during this process.
Speaker McCarthy Annoucned that the House’s investigation so far has “found that President Biden lied to the American people about knowledge of his family’s foreign business dealings.”
McCarthy continued:
“Eyewitness testimony revealed that the President joined multiple phone calls and had various interactions with his son’s business partners.
“For example, Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s business partner, testified that Joe Biden spoke or met with Hunter Biden’s business associates around 20 times and that, after meeting with President Biden, foreign nationals sent Hunter Biden millions of dollars, and bought him a Porsche.
“Bank records show that nearly $20 million in payments were directed to Biden family members and associates through numerous shell companies.
“The Treasury Department has more than 150 transactions involving the Biden family and their business associates that were flagged as ‘suspicious activity’ by U.S. banks.
“A trusted FBI informant provided information about alleged bribes to the Biden family.
“There is also evidence that Biden used his official office to coordinate with Hunter Biden’s business partner about Hunter’s role in Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company.
“Finally, despite these serious allegations, it appears that the President’s family has been afforded special treatment by Biden’s own administration – treatment they would not otherwise have received if they were not related to the President.
“For example, in July, there was the sweetheart plea deal that President Biden’s Department of Justice tried to sneak past the public.
“Had a federal judge not rejected the deal, it would have gone through unnoticed.”
The global community is eyeing America’s political turmoil, including Putin’s critiques of a deteriorating U.S. democracy. Trump’s Ukraine claims are noted but met with skepticism. This reflects concerns about America’s international image and questions the integrity of its democracy.
Top Comment:
“GOOD to know that Matt Gaetz is making McCarthy do his job!”
(SNews) – A New Mexico sheriff has warned the state’s Democrat governor that there’s “no way we can enforce” her “unconstitutional” gun ban.
Democrat New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham is facing widespread backlash after she signed an executive order to strip American citizens of their Second Amendment rights.
Grisham signed a “public health order” to attempt to ban concealed and open carry permits in the state’s largest city, Albuquerque, and the surrounding Bernalillo County for at least 30 days.
However, the governor has been met with severe pushback from state law enforcement officials.
During a press conference this week, Bernalillo County Sheriff John Allen described Grisham’s 30-day gun ban as “unconstitutional.”
The comments from Allen come despite the sheriff standing beside the governor during her rollout of the policy.
“It’s unconstitutional, so there’s no way we can enforce that order,” the sheriff said in a Monday news conference.
“This ban does nothing to curb gun violence.”
“We must always remember not only are we protecting the Second Amendment, but at the same time, we have a lot of violence within our community.
“Let me be clear, I hold my standards high, and I do not or never will hedge on what is right.”
Grisham issued an emergency order on Friday suspending the right to carry guns in public following recent instances of gun violence.
The governor has acknowledged that she expects the order to face legal challenges.
However, Grisham claims to be acting in response to recent gun-related deaths, such as an 11-year-old boy who was shot and killed outside a minor league baseball stadium earlier this week.
The suspension was classified as an emergency public health order and applies to open and concealed carry in most public places, excluding police and licensed security guards.
The restriction is connected to a threshold for violent crime rates met only by the Albuquerque area.
However, the gun ban only targets law-abiding citizens and the governor has yet to explain how such a move will stop criminals.
Allen claims he pressured the governor not to sign the “public health order,” saying “[Grisham] knew we as law enforcement did not agree with the order, and as a result, this was solely her decision.”
Grisham fired back at Allen following his press conference.
She ordered the law enforcement official to “stop being squeamish” about enforcing the order.
“I don’t need a lecture on constitutionality from Sheriff Allen: what I need is action,” Grisham said in a statement responding to Allen.
“What we need is for leaders to stand up for the victims of violent crime.
“We need law enforcement, district attorneys, public officials, school leaders and state agencies to use every single tool at their disposal to stop this violence. Period.”
“We’ve given you the tools, Sheriff Allen — now stop being squeamish about using them,” she continued.
“I will not back down from doing what’s right and I will always put the safety of the people of New Mexico first.”
Violators could face civil penalties and a fine of up to $5,000, according to the governor’s spokeswoman Caroline Sweeney.
The governor said state police are responsible for enforcing the order, but she acknowledged not all law enforcement officials – including the district attorney for the Albuquerque area – agree with it.
Grisham cited several recent shootings in Albuquerque when issuing the order.
During one recent incident on August 13, 5-year-old Galilea Samaniego was shot and killed as she slept.
Four teens entered a mobile home community in two stolen vehicles and opened fire on the child’s home.
The girl was shot in the head and died from her injuries at a hospital.
Grisham has yet to explain why she believes the violent criminals responsible for such shootings will abide by her “public health order.”
slaynews.com/news/new-mexico-sheriff-reality-check-democrat-gov-unconstitutional-gun-ban/
Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy announced an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden and his son Hunter’s business dealings with foreign nations. Do Republicans have any real evidence that the Biden family made money? Bill O’Reilly explains how this inquiry could backfire if they do not.
Top Comment:
“Follow the money!!! Treason…”
President Biden made a false statement to the nation today when he claimed to have been present at Ground Zero the day after the terrorist attacks occurred.
“Ground Zero in New York and I remember standing there the next day and looking at the building,” he said. “I felt like I was looking through the gates of Hell. It looked so devastating.”
In reality, President Biden was in Washington, D.C. on September 12th. He delivered his remarks about the attacks from a military base in Alaska. This decision drew strong criticism from the families of the survivors, who expected him to attend an official memorial service.
“The president should absolutely be there, just like he should be in Ohio, just like he should be in Hawaii,” former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R) told Fox News, referring to East Palestine, Ohio, which Biden still hasn’t visited following a train derailment earlier this year, and Maui, where he visited days after wildfires burned parts of the island this summer.
“You never forget what happened on 9/11, that shook America to its core,” Haley said. “He should be there; it’s a great message to send.”
Former New York Gov. George Pataki (R) expressed his disapproval, calling Biden’s absence from New York City for the anniversary “a disgrace” during an interview with 77WABC.
Watch:
