Remember when life was simpler and gas was affordable? Oh, that’s right, it was just a few short years ago during the Trump presidency.

Top Comment:

“Yeah thank you so much Joe Biden you just made everything so much better… NOT!!!! That’s a laugh.”

Well, it’s not just a hypothetical; it’s the latest saga in the never-ending quest to penalize Donald Trump. The Democrats are trying to charge him over what he did with his own mugshot from Georgia

Top Comment:

“Every time they hit Trump, he counterpunches”

Georgia’s Republican Attorney General, Chris Carr, announced on Tuesday that he is pursuing racketeering-related charges against more than 60 left-wing protesters who have been involved in violent activities aimed at obstructing the construction of a police training facility near Atlanta.

The construction of the Atlanta Public Safety Training Center, commonly referred to as “Cop City” by anti-police activists, has faced ongoing disruptions and occupations by leftist groups seeking to halt its development.

In accordance with Georgia’s racketeering laws, Carr has characterized these individuals as “militant anarchists.” It’s worth noting that these are the same laws employed by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in her indictment of former President Donald Trump and 18 others, accusing them of attempting to overturn the 2020 election. While some may view Carr’s actions as a response to Willis’s prosecutions, the charges stem from alleged conspiracy to obstruct the training center’s construction, as well as involvement in violent acts, intimidation, and property destruction.

The anarchists have targeted various aspects of the facility, including a police vehicle in July, along with attacks on construction equipment and arson incidents, including one in March. These disruptions have persisted since construction began in 2021, as reported by the Associated Press.

“Carr cited the instances of violence and intimidation as his rationale for going after the individuals he said were behind it,” the Western Journal noted, adding: “Defendants include more than three dozen people who have previously been charged with domestic terrorism and other acts in connection to the violent protests and riots at or near the training center.”

Furthermore, it’s worth mentioning that three leaders of the resistance movement are now facing money laundering charges, as reported in the aforementioned accounts. The inclusion of these additional RICO charges has the potential to extend the length of any eventual conviction and subsequent sentence.

Earlier in the year, Carr made it clear via social media that he was fully prepared to employ the full extent of legal measures to address the acts of anarchy.

“We are not Oregon. We are not California. We are not Washington. You cannot come to our state, break our laws, throw rocks at buildings, damage property, and shoot police officers,” he wrote as he shared a Fox News story regarding the ongoing violence against the facility. “You can and you will be charged, and that’s exactly what we’re doing.”

We are not Oregon. We are not California. We are not Washington.

You cannot come to our state, break our laws, throw rocks at buildings, damage property, and shoot police officers.

You can and you will be charged, and that’s exactly what we’re doing. https://t.co/nYMJEYo4vV

— GA AG Chris Carr (@Georgia_AG) January 24, 2023

Republican Reps. Jim Jordan and James Comer join ‘Hannity’ to discuss new evidence being produced in the Hunter Biden investigation and the possibility of an impeachment inquiry

Top Comment:

“The Republican’s BETTER immediately start a impeachment committee!”

House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer sounds off on ‘The Ingraham Angle.’

Top Comment:

“How can a country be 34 trillion in debt, and still give billions to other countries?”

President Joe Biden, a Democrat, has faced criticism on social media following the White House’s announcement of the intention to reinstate indoor mask mandates.

On Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre provided updates in the press room regarding these new “precautions.”

Jean-Pierre disclosed that President Biden will resume wearing masks indoors and will also require those around him to do the same for the foreseeable future.

This decision follows an announcement made on Monday that “fully vaccinated” First Lady Jill Biden had tested positive for COVID-19.

“I can tell you that the first lady is experiencing mild symptoms and will remain in Delaware for the week,” Jean-Pierre said.

“President Biden tested negative last night for COVID-19 and tested negative again today.

“He’s not experiencing any symptoms.

“As far as the steps he is taking since the president was with the first lady yesterday, he will be masking while indoors and around people in alignment with CDC guidance.”

“As has been the practice in the past, the president will remove his mask when sufficiently distant from others indoors and while outside as well,” she added.

The decision by President Biden to resume indoor masking has sparked a backlash on Twitter. Many individuals are expressing concerns that this move may signal a return to mask mandates for the general public.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s (R-CA) spokesman Chad Gilmartin reminded his followers:

“‘I’m going to shut down the virus.’ — Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign promise.”

Cryptocurrency entrepreneur Bruce Fenton wrote: “The conspiracy theorists were right again.

“These loony psychopaths are going to try to bring masks back.

“Nope. We aren’t playing this time.”

Fox News contributor Katie Pavlich commented: “Your regular reminder that masks are garbage against COVID/Wuhan coronavirus and do not work.

The ‘Fox & Friends’ co-hosts discussed Trump’s warning and broader concerns surrounding Biden’s 2024 re-election bid.

Top Comment:

““Is the president making stuff up?” He has been all his political career.”

A central tenet of the Progressive movement is the indoctrination of children. No place is this more evident than Democrat-controlled school districts.

Top Comment:

“The so-called “progressives” want chaos and mayhem to convince the sheep that socialism will “work better””

A U.S. federal court has determined that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under Democrat President Joe Biden’s leadership exceeded its jurisdiction by disseminating inaccurate information on social media concerning the use of ivermectin for COVID-19.

U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, ruled against the FDA’s messaging that advised Americans to cease using ivermectin for treating Covid.

In 2021, the FDA initiated a social media campaign that ridiculed individuals using ivermectin as a Covid treatment. The FDA incorrectly asserted that ivermectin was a medication intended for horses and cautioned the American public against using it for managing coronavirus symptoms.

The FDA’s response came as people were resorting to self-medication with ivermectin due to reports suggesting its high efficacy in treating Covid. Subsequently, scientific studies have confirmed the drug’s remarkable effectiveness against the virus.

As was recently reported, a peer-reviewed study demonstrated that ivermectin can reduce COVID-19-related deaths by 74%.

Judge Willett stated in his ruling, “The FDA can provide information, but it has not identified any legal authority that allows it to advise consumers to ‘stop’ taking a medication.”

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA issued multiple statements discouraging the use of ivermectin for Covid. One particular social media post from August 2021 featured an image of a horse and provided a link to an FDA webpage on ivermectin.

“You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

The page it linked to is titled, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.”

You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it. https://t.co/TWb75xYEY4

— U.S. FDA (@US_FDA) August 21, 2021

Three doctors have also previously filed a lawsuit against the FDA. They assert that the FDA lacks the authority to offer guidance to physicians regarding drug prescriptions.

It’s important to note that the FDA has approved ivermectin as an antiparasitic medication for use in both humans and animals. Contrary to the FDA’s erroneous assertions, ivermectin is not exclusively intended for horses and cows. It has a wide range of applications and is regularly prescribed to humans by healthcare professionals.

The FDA contends that it operated within its jurisdiction when disseminating the inaccurate information about ivermectin to the American public. Federal law generally provides government entities with immunity against legal actions. However, there are exceptions to this rule.

One such exception, referred to as “ultra vires,” arises when an official acts beyond their authorized scope. To challenge these actions, plaintiffs must demonstrate that the official was “acting ‘without any authority whatever,’ or without any ‘colorable basis for the exercise of authority,'” as outlined in a previous court ruling.

Both parties concur that the FDA has the authority to share data and facts. However, they disagree on whether the FDA can issue recommendations concerning medical matters, including treatments.

The FDA has argued that their statements do not constitute advice, asserting in one brief that they were “informational statements” that do not directly instruct consumers or others to take specific actions. Simultaneously, the FDA acknowledged that these statements “provided recommendations” and offered advice to consumers.

“Despite these concessions, FDA never points to any authority that allows it to issue recommendations or give medical advice,” Judge Willett wrote.

“Rather, FDA argues that some posts included a hyperlink that leads to the update.

“The update, in turn, directs consumers to “[t]alk to your health care provider.”

“But not all of the social media posts included such a link.

“And even for those posts that did include a link, the posts themselves offer advice, not mere information.”

The judge expressed concerns about the problematic nature of the FDA’s update, primarily its title, which reads, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.” Although the update later acknowledges that individuals can take ivermectin when prescribed by a healthcare provider, the judge noted that the initial instruction’s imperative tone remains unchanged.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown had ruled against the doctors in 2022, finding that they had not established an exception to sovereign immunity, and there was no evidence that the FDA had exceeded its authority under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

However, the recent ruling contends that Judge Brown made an error in his second point. According to the new ruling, “Nothing in the Act’s plain text authorizes the FDA to provide medical advice or recommendations,” as stated by Judge Willett.

Judge Willett, who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, was appointed during the Trump administration. He was joined in the decision by U.S. Circuit Judges Edith Brown Clement and Jennifer Walker Elrod. Judges Clement and Elrod were appointed during President George W. Bush’s tenure.

The appeals court panel has sent the case back to Judge Brown to determine whether the doctors have legal standing.

The ruling comes following oral arguments presented before the panel. Dr. Robert Apter, one of the plaintiffs, celebrated the ruling as “a significant victory for doctors and patients.”

As of now, there has been no response from the Biden administration regarding this ruling.

Economist Steve Moore offers his outlook after key inflation gauge ticks higher in July on ‘Your World.’

Top Comment:

“Remember when the media laughed at Trump when he said literally EVERYTHING that’s happening, would happen? ”